Mapping borrower overlap and concentration risk across the publicly traded BDC universe
Published by GP Stakes, the private markets intelligence platform
Concentration risk is one of the most underappreciated dynamics in the BDC market. When multiple business development companies lend to the same borrower, a single default can ripple across multiple portfolios simultaneously. This report examines the extent of borrower overlap across 23,006 distinct companies held by 43 publicly traded BDCs, totalling $5071.4B in aggregate fair value.
Our analysis reveals that 1,772 borrowers appear in at least two BDC portfolios. While diversification is a core principle of credit portfolio construction, the practical reality is that many BDCs draw from the same pool of middle-market borrowers. This creates hidden correlations that standard portfolio metrics may not capture.
For institutional investors evaluating BDC allocations, understanding which names are shared across vehicles is essential for managing aggregate exposure. A pension fund holding three BDCs may unknowingly have triple exposure to the same underlying credits. This analysis provides the transparency needed to make informed allocation decisions.
Borrowers appearing in three or more BDC portfolios, ranked by the number of BDCs holding the position.
| Borrower | BDCs Holding | Total Fair Value | Total Par/Principal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity | 8 | $16.2B | $29.2B |
| Integrity Marketing Acquisition, LLC | 8 | $7.3B | $16.1B |
| Common Stock | 8 | $3.1B | $2505.0B |
| Avalara, Inc. | 7 | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| Preferred Stock | 6 | $1.5B | $609.9M |
| Isagenix International, LLC | 6 | $614.0M | $529.0M |
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 6 | N/A | N/A |
| MRI Software LLC | 5 | $3.9B | $3.8B |
| Diligent Corporation | 5 | $3.4B | $3.3B |
| Burgess Point Purchaser Corporation | 5 | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Unsecured Debt | 5 | $1.0B | $950.2M |
| VT Topco, Inc. | 5 | $548.6M | $556.7M |
| Zest Acquisition Corp. | 5 | $520.9M | $537.0M |
| Access CIG, LLC | 5 | $398.1M | $596.6M |
| Cash | 5 | $220.7M | N/A |
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | 5 | N/A | N/A |
| Receivable for investments sold | 5 | N/A | N/A |
| Distributions payable | 5 | N/A | N/A |
| Capital in excess of par value | 5 | N/A | N/A |
| Software | 4 | $45.4B | $33.3B |
| First lien | 4 | $28.2B | $30.7B |
| Park Place Technologies, LLC | 4 | $10.3B | $8.0B |
| THG Acquisition, LLC | 4 | $7.2B | $1.9B |
| Pluralsight, Inc. | 4 | $3.6B | $3.3B |
| Second lien | 4 | $3.6B | $2.5B |
| Debt | 4 | $3.3B | N/A |
| Team Services Group, LLC | 4 | $2.9B | $1.7B |
| PetVet Care Centers, LLC | 4 | $2.7B | $2.7B |
| Thrasio, LLC | 4 | $2.2B | $4.3B |
| iCIMS, Inc. | 4 | $2.2B | $2.4B |
| Lash OpCo, LLC | 4 | $2.0B | $2.2B |
| IG Investments Holdings, LLC | 4 | $1.8B | $1.8B |
| Florida Food Products, LLC | 4 | $1.8B | $1.6B |
| Inventus Power, Inc. | 4 | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| UniTek Global Services, Inc. | 4 | $1.5B | $100.5M |
| Cadence Aerospace, LLC | 4 | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Apptio, Inc. | 4 | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| DRS Holdings III, Inc. | 4 | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| USALCO, LLC | 4 | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| DTI Holdco, Inc. | 4 | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Applied Technical Services, LLC | 4 | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Exigo, LLC | 4 | $1.1B | $40.8B |
| Express Wash Acquisition Company, LLC | 4 | $949.3M | $1.0B |
| Smartronix, LLC | 4 | $890.8M | $895.3M |
| Help/Systems Holdings, Inc. | 4 | $869.6M | $898.1M |
| Idera, Inc. | 4 | $774.0M | $796.4M |
| Truck-Lite Co., LLC | 4 | $744.1M | $834.2M |
| Icefall Parent, Inc. | 4 | $683.1M | $667.8M |
| Businessolver.com, Inc. | 4 | $622.0M | $706.7M |
| CHA Holdings, Inc. | 4 | $574.4M | $581.1M |
What percentage of each BDC's borrowers also appear in at least one other BDC portfolio?
| BDC | Distinct Borrowers | Shared Borrower % |
|---|---|---|
| BlackRock Capital Investment Corp | 197 | 78.2% |
| PennantPark Investment Corp | 1816 | 49.7% |
| PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd | 2141 | 43.8% |
| BlackRock TCP Capital Corp | 505 | 37.8% |
| New Mountain Finance Corp | 336 | 31.3% |
| Carlyle Secured Lending Inc | 424 | 30.7% |
| Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 767 | 16.3% |
| Goldman Sachs BDC Inc | 359 | 15.9% |
| PhenixFIN Corp | 87 | 14.9% |
| MidCap Financial Investment Corp | 577 | 14.6% |
| Crescent Capital BDC Inc | 537 | 14.5% |
| Prospect Capital Corp | 687 | 12.7% |
| Capital Southwest Corp | 347 | 12.4% |
| Main Street Capital Corp | 265 | 11.7% |
| Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp | 1157 | 11.6% |
| Logan Ridge Finance Corp | 187 | 10.7% |
| Ares Capital Corp | 1415 | 10.2% |
| Golub Capital BDC Inc | 101 | 9.9% |
| SLR Investment Corp | 343 | 8.7% |
| TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp | 437 | 7.8% |
Aggregate exposure by sector, showing average BDC overlap per borrower within each sector.
| Sector | Borrowers | Total Fair Value | Avg BDCs per Borrower |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 8,548 | $2356.7B | 1.1 |
| Healthcare | 1,748 | $223.9B | 1.1 |
| Financial Services | 1,371 | $218.8B | 1.1 |
| Consumer | 1,874 | $209.8B | 1.1 |
| Business Services | 1,707 | $125.7B | 1.1 |
| Media & Telecom | 1,192 | $98.4B | 1.1 |
| Transportation | 563 | $68.0B | 1.1 |
| Energy | 474 | $63.0B | 1.0 |
| Industrials | 859 | $50.9B | 1.1 |
| Aerospace & Defense | 413 | $43.9B | 1.2 |
| Real Estate | 193 | $21.7B | 1.0 |
| Education | 133 | $13.1B | 1.0 |
| Environmental Services | 111 | $5.7B | 1.0 |
| Agriculture | 40 | $3.7B | 1.1 |
The concentration patterns revealed in this data carry several practical implications. First, investors building multi-BDC portfolios should cross-reference underlying holdings to avoid unintended concentration. Second, sectors with high overlap rates may represent crowded trades where competitive dynamics could compress spreads or loosen covenants. Third, in a stress scenario, correlated defaults across multiple BDC portfolios could amplify losses beyond what single-portfolio analysis would suggest.
The private credit market has grown substantially over the past decade, with BDC assets expanding faster than the pool of quality middle-market borrowers. This supply-demand imbalance naturally leads to greater portfolio overlap. Monitoring this overlap over time provides an early warning signal for credit cycle dynamics.
This analysis is derived from SEC filings (10-K and 10-Q) of 43 publicly traded BDCs. Portfolio positions are extracted from the Schedule of Investments in each filing. Borrower matching is performed using normalized company names. Fair values and par amounts reflect the most recent filing for each BDC. Data is updated as new filings become available.
Dive deeper into the data with our comprehensive directory, advanced search, and custom analytics.
Last updated: 3 April 2026