Comprehensive ranking of all publicly traded BDCs by portfolio size, position count, and borrower diversification
Published by GP Stakes, the private markets intelligence platform
The Business Development Company market has matured into a significant segment of the publicly traded credit universe. With 39 BDCs managing a combined $5188.5B in fair value across 485,265 individual positions, the sector provides meaningful exposure to middle-market private credit.
This ranking provides a clear view of relative portfolio size across the BDC universe. The dispersion between the largest and smallest BDCs is significant, with top-tier managers commanding portfolios many multiples larger than their smaller peers. This scale differential has important implications for borrower access, fee efficiency, and portfolio diversification.
We also include a diversification analysis using a modified Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) to identify which BDCs maintain the most granular borrower exposure. Lower HHI scores indicate greater portfolio diversification, which may provide more resilience during credit stress events.
| Rank | BDC | Ticker | Total Fair Value | Total Par | Positions | Borrowers | Avg Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FS KKR Capital Corp | FSK | $995.4B | $277130.3B | 6,287 | 662 | $183.5M |
| 2 | Ares Capital Corp | ARCC | $876.2B | $1039.7B | 27,542 | 1,415 | $32.7M |
| 3 | Golub Capital BDC Inc | GBDC | $465.7B | $375.2B | 40,527 | 101 | $12.5M |
| 4 | Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | BXSL | $359.7B | $1333.9B | 17,299 | 767 | $23.2M |
| 5 | PennantPark Investment Corp | PNNT | $249.8B | $2970.9B | 35,134 | 1,816 | $8.5M |
| 6 | Crescent Capital BDC Inc | CCAP | $233.9B | $793.5B | 18,181 | 537 | $12.9M |
| 7 | New Mountain Finance Corp | NMFC | $203.3B | $1726.8B | 20,254 | 336 | $11.0M |
| 8 | PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd | PFLT | $196.8B | $840.2B | 35,064 | 2,141 | $6.5M |
| 9 | Hercules Capital Inc | HTGC | $191.2B | $7877.3B | 11,035 | 552 | $17.5M |
| 10 | Carlyle Secured Lending Inc | CGBD | $188.4B | $103.6B | 12,366 | 424 | $18.0M |
| 11 | BlackRock TCP Capital Corp | TCPC | $148.1B | $79.0B | 17,200 | 505 | $10.7M |
| 12 | Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp | OCSL | $109.0B | $892.1B | 13,599 | 1,157 | $8.0M |
| 13 | Saratoga Investment Corp | SAR | $103.8B | $84.6B | 27,912 | 1,063 | $5.4M |
| 14 | Goldman Sachs BDC Inc | GSBD | $90.8B | $262.3B | 13,852 | 359 | $6.6M |
| 15 | Trinity Capital Inc | TRIN | $77.8B | $7112.0B | 20,626 | 703 | $4.3M |
| 16 | Prospect Capital Corp | PSEC | $72.8B | $51.2B | 22,251 | 687 | $3.8M |
| 17 | Barings BDC Inc | BBDC | $71.0B | $82.2B | 17,574 | 1,141 | $4.1M |
| 18 | CION Investment Corp | CION | $66.4B | $94.7B | 8,784 | 1,092 | $8.2M |
| 19 | WhiteHorse Finance Inc | WHF | $65.4B | $33.8B | 10,141 | 649 | $7.2M |
| 20 | TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp | TPVG | $64.4B | $1861.3B | 15,504 | 437 | $4.2M |
| 21 | Stellus Capital Investment Corp | SCM | $64.1B | $32.1B | 11,187 | 476 | $7.3M |
| 22 | Bain Capital Specialty Finance Inc | BCSF | $46.5B | $15.1B | 17,585 | 1,138 | $2.6M |
| 23 | Main Street Capital Corp | MAIN | $34.1B | $17.2B | 422 | 265 | $195.1M |
| 24 | Monroe Capital Corp | MRCC | $33.7B | $87.3B | 13,974 | 964 | $2.8M |
| 25 | Gladstone Capital Corp | GLAD | $32.1B | $775.6B | 3,248 | 957 | $10.7M |
| 26 | Gladstone Investment Corp | GAIN | $28.8B | $413.5B | 1,983 | 643 | $15.3M |
| 27 | SuRo Capital Corp | SSSS | $23.8B | $7.6B | 5,003 | 379 | $5.3M |
| 28 | Oxford Square Capital Corp | OXSQ | $17.6B | $23.6B | 2,064 | 897 | $8.7M |
| 29 | SLR Investment Corp | SLRC | $13.8B | $4.7B | 5,914 | 343 | $2.5M |
| 30 | Horizon Technology Finance Corp | HRZN | $13.1B | $13.6B | 3,766 | 178 | $3.5M |
| 31 | BlackRock Capital Investment Corp | BKCC | $12.8B | $14.4B | 3,320 | 197 | $4.1M |
| 32 | MidCap Financial Investment Corp | MFIC | $11.8B | $51.5B | 11,386 | 577 | $1.0M |
| 33 | Logan Ridge Finance Corp | LRFC | $9.1B | $271.6B | 3,298 | 187 | $3.2M |
| 34 | Capital Southwest Corp | CSWC | $8.3B | $8.4B | 3,344 | 347 | $2.5M |
| 35 | Rand Capital Corp | RAND | $3.8B | $686.7M | 4,075 | 534 | $1.3M |
| 36 | Great Elm Capital Corp | GECC | $2.6B | $69.4B | 2,637 | 354 | $1.2M |
| 37 | NewtekOne Inc | NEWT | $2.0B | $2.3B | 423 | 51 | $5.2M |
| 38 | PhenixFIN Corp | PFX | $799.8M | $993.8M | 127 | 87 | $9.9M |
| 39 | Fidus Investment Corp | FDUS | $1.5M | $9.8M | 377 | 22 | $5K |
BDCs ranked by portfolio concentration using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. Lower scores indicate greater diversification.
| BDC | Borrowers | Total Fair Value | HHI Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barings BDC Inc | 1,113 | $71.0B | 43 |
| Oxford Square Capital Corp | 875 | $14.6B | 51 |
| CION Investment Corp | 1,006 | $66.2B | 61 |
| Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp | 1,071 | $109.0B | 70 |
| Monroe Capital Corp | 886 | $28.0B | 82 |
| Capital Southwest Corp | 334 | $8.3B | 94 |
| Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 734 | $359.7B | 106 |
| Rand Capital Corp | 445 | $3.8B | 108 |
| WhiteHorse Finance Inc | 509 | $32.6B | 113 |
| Gladstone Investment Corp | 608 | $28.8B | 127 |
| Goldman Sachs BDC Inc | 356 | $90.8B | 130 |
| BlackRock TCP Capital Corp | 458 | $144.6B | 145 |
| Horizon Technology Finance Corp | 178 | $13.0B | 167 |
| BlackRock Capital Investment Corp | 184 | $11.1B | 171 |
| PennantPark Investment Corp | 1,639 | $249.8B | 181 |
| PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd | 1,927 | $196.7B | 199 |
| Ares Capital Corp | 1,346 | $876.2B | 249 |
| MidCap Financial Investment Corp | 568 | $11.8B | 252 |
| Bain Capital Specialty Finance Inc | 1,049 | $16.9B | 315 |
| Great Elm Capital Corp | 280 | $2.6B | 413 |
Portfolio size is not the only metric that matters when evaluating BDCs. The number of distinct borrowers, average position size, and sector diversification all contribute to the risk profile. Larger BDCs typically benefit from better access to deal flow, lower unit costs, and stronger relationships with private equity sponsors who generate much of the middle-market lending opportunity set.
Smaller BDCs may offer more specialized sector focus or geographic concentration that can generate higher yields. However, they also face higher concentration risk and may struggle to compete for the most attractive credits in a competitive market. Understanding where each BDC sits on this spectrum is fundamental to building a well-constructed private credit allocation.
Rankings are based on aggregate fair value from the most recent SEC filing (10-K or 10-Q) for each BDC. Position counts include all line items from the Schedule of Investments. The HHI is calculated as the sum of squared portfolio weight percentages for each borrower, where 10,000 would indicate a single-borrower portfolio. Data updates automatically as new filings are processed.
Dive deeper into the data with our comprehensive directory, advanced search, and custom analytics.
Last updated: 3 April 2026